Search This Blog

Friday, January 31, 2014

south east asian dna is older than souther chinese dna comment ?

  1. Great article dude!

  2. Welcome to The Malay Archipelago,Malay Region ,Malay Race,Malay World and self Believe of being a Malay.SyabaS.

  3. Welcome to The Malay Archipelago,Malay Region ,Malay Race,Malay World and self Believe of being a Malay

    Give me counter thesis.

  4. finally be able to access thru this blog .thanks for sharing.
    great articles.
    i believe that asian races is complex and interesting to research on. btw the main classes of races before it break up into other races is 3 main race which is blacks, white and asian.
    the rest develops into more complex sub race and languages.
    btw natives tribe in North and south america are asian too.

    from x-men .

  5. my father comes from fujian. my son and i look abit "different" from average chinese here. one day while holidaying in NZ, we saw a aborigine boy. his features very similar to my son. i'v been thinking about our gene since. thanks for your great article .

  6. I am a kayan(a Sarawak tribe). My dialect is 50% malay based. I look chinese (fujian type) although i am pretty sure i have no known direct chinese ancestry. Many tagalog words are similiar to kayan. (Tian=stomach), (nyipen=teeth), (kiut=sexual intercourse), (likut=back), (buhuk=hair). My tribe is a thousand miles away from the philipines and yet theres a dialect linkage. I believe my forefathers came from fujian then to taiwan then to the philipines and finally setttling in borneo. We are All malays.

  7. IT'S A LIE! DON'T BELIEVE THIS NONSENSE.... RESEARCHERS HAVE ALREADY PROVE THAT SOUTH-EAST ASIAN DNA ARE OLDER THAN THE NORTH-EAST ASIAN, THE MIGRATION BEGINS FROM THE SOUTH, NOT NORTH!

  8. IT'S A LIE! DON'T BELIEVE THIS NONSENSE.... RESEARCHERS HAVE ALREADY PROVE THAT SOUTH-EAST ASIAN DNA ARE OLDER THAN THE NORTH-EAST ASIAN, THE MIGRATION BEGINS FROM THE SOUTH, NOT NORTH!

    Cool down. There are different opinions and people could have migrated both ways.

    If your argument is valid, then ancestors of Genghis Khan, Manchus, Japanese and Koreans all came from somewhere near Malaysia?

    You 100% sure? 

    You can cite your research and people has their research to proof otherwise. Grow up.

  9. Veritas, you're incredible!

    Keep going.

    Love your fantastic insight, in depth research and man-made points.

    I wonder what gene/dna stock you are of? Must be something really special rarely any one else can claim of.

    Do you eat animal shit for your meals? Bet you dont bathe more than once a year. How many mao zedong wall-size portraits do you pray to every night before going to sleep? Do you sleep in a communist CCCP dress? 

    Lol.

  10. The following is quoted from a scientific research paper from Human Genome Organisation:

    "The study also suggested that there was one major inflow of human migration into Asia arising from Southeast Asia, rather than multiple inflows from both southern and northern routes as proposed before. This indicates that Southeast Asia was the major geographic source of East Asian and North Asian populations."

    http://www.hugo-international.org/blog/?p=123

  11. I can always find article which states migration the other way round as well.

    Some suggest that Austronesian languages, and therefore cultures, originated on Taiwan between 5000BP and 6000BP (Bellwood 1995). Three factors mark Taiwan as a likely place where Austronesian language and culture first developed: (1) Taiwan has the greatest diversity of Austronesian languages presently and historically, so much so that a top level linguistic subcategory of Formosan languages is currently used to identify Austronesian languages spoken in Taiwan, contrasted with the neighboring subcategory of Malayo-Polynesian (Tryon 1995, 24-27); (2) the physiological, or genetic, variation of Taiwan’s Austronesian population is greater than any other island in the Pacific; and (3) archaeological dates for the Austronesian cultural complex of pig domestication, agriculture, and pottery are found in Taiwan earlier than elsewhere in Island Southeast Asia or Oceania.


    The above is POV of anthropologist and linguist. 

    However, genetist suggested migration of genes flow from SE Asia to East Asia.

  12. The answer could be both way migration. 

    It appears that the proto people migrated from India, enter SE Asia through Myanmmar, from the inference of genetist. Look at the diagram you given me.

    Date is 60,000 BP.

    From Myammar, the gene spread to SE Asia and E Asia. That is the first wave.

    But does these proto people who migrated to SE Asia speak Malay? That is a question mark.

    The anthropologist state that Malay started migrating from Taiwan around 5000-6000BP.

    So the next wave starting from Taiwan could have spread Malay thoughout Oceania.

    No contradiction if we say Malay from Taiwan.

    http://veritas-lux.blogspot.com/2013/03/the-malay-race-1.html?m=1

No comments:

Post a Comment

Blog Archive